Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1977 17(2):411-429; doi:10.1093/icb/17.2.411
© 1977 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NORTHCUTT, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Elasmobranch Central Nervous System Organization and Its Possible Evolutionary Significance

R. GLENN NORTHCUTT
Division of Biological Sciences, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109

Examination of shark brain:body ratios reveals that these taxa possess relative brain volumes in a range overlapping those of bony fish as well as birds and mammals. Much of the variation is due to relative development of the telencephalon and cerebellum. Telencephalic weights vary from 24% in Squalus to 52% in Sphyrna. Analysis of the cytoarchitectonics of the shark brains reveals at least two patterns of development. Squalomorph sharks possess low brain:body ratios, and the telencephalon of these taxa possess well developed lateral ventricles and poorly developed pallial areas. The diencephalon is characterized by prominent periventricular laminae, and the cerebellum lacks foliation. The lamniform and carcharhiniform sharks are characterized by high brain: body ratios, and there is marked hypertrophy of the telencephalon. The roof (pallial) regions, as well as the diencephalon, are characterized by extensive cellular migrations. The cerebella of these forms possess extensive complex foliation.

These brain patterns are compared with the brain organization of Holocephali, and I conclude that the holocephalans are a sister radiation of the elasmobranchs. Comparisons with bony fish and land vertebrates suggest that elasmobranchs have independently developed complex pallial fields and cerebellar foliation as a result of parallel evolutionary trends.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.