Skip Navigation

American Zoologist 1977 17(2):443-452; doi:10.1093/icb/17.2.443
© 1977 by The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by POPPER, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by FAY, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Structure and Function of the Elasmobranch Auditory System

ARTHUR N. POPPER1 and RICHARD R. FAY2
1Department of Zoology and Laboratory of Sensory Sciences, University of Hawaii Honolulu, Hawaii 96822
2Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago, Illinois

Behavioral evidence indicates that sharks detect underwater sound at frequencies up to 1000 Hz, and that certain low frequency signals attract sharks from large distances. It appears that the adequate stimulus for "sound detecting" systems of the shark is panicle motion, as opposed to fluctuations in sound pressure. The elasmobranch ear consists of the three semi-circular canals for detecting angular accelerations, and otolith organs for detecting linear motion and accelerations due to gravity. Two of these organs, the sacculus and macula neglecta, have been shown to be responsive to vibratory motion, with the macula neglecta having best sensitivity to vertical movements. A direct vibrational pathway exists to the macula neglecta from the parietal fossa of the dorsal chondrocranium. It is not clear at present, however, whether it is the inner ear or the lateral line system which is responsible for hearing. Both detection systems are theoretically capable of providing information to the brain about sound source location using non-parallel arrays of directionally sensitive hair-cell receptors. Recent theories of underwater sound localization by fishes and sharks suggest that the ability to detect a vertical displacement component of an acoustic signal (e. g., via the macula neglecta) is necessary for instantaneous location decisions. It is not known, however, whether the sharks localize by processing information about various aspects of the sound field simultaneously (in parallel), or whether the sound field is sampled successively at different points in space. Clearly, more experimental work on the physiology of elasmobranch acoustic behavior is called for.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.